Materiality in planning and performing an audit
Materiality
Financial statements are reliable if
there are no material misstatements in them. Accordingly, when conducting an
audit, it becomes necessary to determine the level of materiality.
In planning the audit, the auditor makes
judgments about misstatements that will be considered material. These judgments
provide a basis for:
(a) Determining the risk assessment procedures.
(b)
Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement; and
(c) Determining the nature, timing and extent of
audit procedures and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.
A percentage is often applied to a
chosen benchmark as a starting point in determining materiality for the
financial statements as a whole. Examples of benchmarks that may be appropriate, depending on the
circumstances of the company, include categories of reported income such as
profit before tax, total revenue, gross profit and total expenses, total equity
or net asset value. Determining a percentage to be
applied to a chosen benchmark is a matter of professional judgment and depends
on the nature of company. For example, the auditor may consider five
percent of profit before tax to be appropriate for a commercial company in a
manufacturing industry, while one percent of total revenue or total expenses to
be appropriate for a not-for-profit company.
The following benchmarks and percentages may be
appropriate in the calculation of materiality for the financial statements
as a whole:
Value |
% |
Profit before tax |
5 |
Gross profit |
0.5-1 |
Revenue |
0.5-1 |
Total assets |
1-2 |
Net assets |
2-5 |
Profit after tax |
5-10 |
Materiality Level or Levels for Particular
Classes of Transactions, Account Balances or Disclosures
In the
specific circumstances of the company, there is one or more particular classes
of transactions, account balances or disclosures for which misstatements of
lesser amounts than materiality for the financial statements as a whole
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken
on the basis of the financial statements. In this situation the auditor shall
also determine the materiality level or levels to be applied to those
particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures. The
auditor’s determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment.
Factors that may indicate the existence of one or more particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures for which the materiality level could be determined are following:
· If law, regulation or the applicable financial reporting framework affect users’ expectations regarding the measurement or disclosure of certain items (for example, related party transactions, and the remuneration of management and those charged with governance).
· The key disclosures in relation to the industry in which the company operates (for example, research and development costs for a pharmaceutical company).
· Attention is sometimes focused on a particular aspect of the company's business that is separately disclosed in the financial statements (for example, a newly acquired business).
Performance materiality
Performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality
for the financial statements as a whole.
It is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that
the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial
statements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. This
means a lower threshold is applied during testing. The risk of misstatements which
could add up to a material misstatement is therefore reduced.
For example, the auditor may set the
performance materiality at the level of 75% from materiality level.
Performance
materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less
than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions,
account balances or disclosures.
Performance materiality relating to a materiality level
determined for a particular class of transactions, account balance or
disclosure is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that
the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in that particular
class of transactions, account balance or disclosure exceeds the
materiality level for that particular class of transactions, account
balance or disclosure.
To ensure that financial statements are free
from material misstatements auditors accumulate misstatements identified during
the audit that are not clearly trivial. Misstatements that are clearly trivial
will be of a wholly different (smaller) order of magnitude, or of a wholly
different nature than those that would be determined to be material, and will
be misstatements that are clearly inconsequential, whether taken individually
or in aggregate and whether judged by any criteria of size, nature or
circumstances. Clearly trivial threshold may be set at the level of 5% of materiality
for the financial statements as a whole.
The auditor must revise materiality for the financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) in following situations:
· There appears new information, or a change in the auditor’s understanding of the company and its operations as a result of performing further audit procedures (for example, a decision to dispose of a major part of the company’s business).
· The actual financial results are likely to be substantially different from the anticipated period-end financial results that were used initially to determine materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
As for documentation, auditors include in the audit
documentation the following amounts and the factors considered in their
determination:
(a) Materiality for the financial statements as
a whole
(b) If
applicable, the materiality level or levels for particular classes of
transactions, account balances or disclosures.
(c)
Performance materiality and
(d) Any
revision of materiality as the audit progressed.
Comments
Post a Comment